Telegram and WhatsApp in Blended Learning: Impact on Online Community and Academic Achievement Among Graduate Students

Kaynakça

1. Aisyah, N., Hartati, S., & Nugraheni, S. (2021). The effects of Telegram in blended learning on academic performance. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 45 64. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1434a
2. Alharthi, M. (2023). Challenges of integrating WhatsApp in education. Journal of Mobile Learning and Educational Technologies, 9(2), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.22329/jmlet.v9i2.1191
3. Alshahrani, K. (2022). The role of instant messaging in education. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(4), 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10032-4
4. Amran, A., Hassan, R., & Rahim, R. (2024). Enhancing student motivation with WhatsApp in online education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), e11234. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11234
5. Arnhold, N. (2021). Tertiary education and economic growth: A global perspective. Journal of Educational Development, 45(3), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jed.2021.03.002ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.12962.
6. Azman, H., Ismail, N., & Ahmad, A. (2018). The role of technology in enhancing visual learning. International Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2018.1234567 Caccavale, F., Gargalo, C. L., Gernaey, K. V., & Krühne, U. (2024). Towards education 4.0: The role of large language models as virtual tutors in chemical engineering. Education for Chemical Engineers, 49, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2024.07.002.
7. Carr, N., Shawon, F., & Jamil, H. (2023). An experiment on leveraging ChatGPT for online teaching and assessment of database students. In IEEE international conference on teaching, assessment and learning for engineering (TALE 2023), Auckland, New Zealand. November 27–December 1, 2023. IEEE Computer Society.
8. Chakravarty, A. (2018 ). Functional dependencies checker.
9. Chirkova, R., Yang, J., & Suciu D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 ACM international conference on management of data, SIGMOD conference 2017, Chicago, IL, USA, May 14–19, 2017 (pp. 1591–1594). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3035918.3058728.
10. Cho, R. (2017). Tool for database design. http://raymondcho.net/RelationalDatabaseTools/RelationalDatabaseTools
11. Chu, S., Li, D., Wang, C., Cheung, A., & Suciu, D. (2017). Demonstration of the cosette automated SQL prover. In S. Salihoglu, W. Zhou,
12. Clarck, H., & Jamil, H. M. (2024). Mixing up gemini and Ast in explains for authentic SQL tutoring. In IEEE international conference on teaching, assessment and learning for engineering, TALE 2024, Bangaluru, India, December 9–12, 2024 (pp. 1–8). IEEE.
13. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(5), 812–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21838. distance education and learning, ICDEL 2023, Beijing, China, June 9–12, 2023 (pp. 8–13). ACM.
14. Dongare, Y. V., Dhabe, P. S., & Deshmukh, S. V. (2011). RDBNorma—A semi-automated tool for relational database schema normalization up to third normal form. ArXiv. https://doiorg/1048550/arXiv11030633.
15. Durov, P. (2020). Telegram: Privacy and security features. Tech Innovations Journal, 8(4), 234- 240. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2020.1234567
16. Elkhatat, A. M. (2023, August). Evaluating the authenticity of ChatGPT responses: A study on text-matching capabilities. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00137-0.
17. Ezra, O., Cohen, A., Bronshtein, A., Gabbay, H., & Baruth, O. (2021). Equity factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: Difficulties in emergency remote teaching (ert) through online learning. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7657–7681.
18. Falode, O. C., & Mohammed, I. A. (2023). Emerging educational techniques in tertiary education. Journal of Educational Innovation, 15(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2023.1234567
19. FD Calculator Team. (2022). Fd calculator. Available online: http://functionaldependencycalculator.ml/(accessed on 1 August 2022)
20. Vargas-Murillo, A. R., de la Asuncion Pari-Bedoya, I. N. M., & de Jesus Guevara-Soto, F. (2023). The ethics of AI assisted learning: A systematic literature review on the impacts of ChatGPT usage in education. In Proceedings of the 2023 8th international conference on
21. Ferro, L. S., Sapio, F., Terracina, A., Temperini, M., & Mecella, M. (2021). Gea2: A serious game for technology-enhanced learning in STEM. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(6), 723–739.
22. Global Monitoring Report Team. (2020). Distance learning statistics during COVID-19. UNESCO. https://unesco.org/distance-learning-statistics-2020
23. Gorichanaz, T. (2023). Accused: How students respond to allegations of using ChatGPT on assessments. ArXiv. https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2308.16374.
24. Gray, D. (2021, October 21). Why is it important for students to feel a sense of belonging at school? NC State College of Education. Retrieved from https://ced.ncsu.edu/news/2021/10/21/why-is-it-important-for-students-to-feel-a-sense-of-belonging-at-school-students-choose-to-be-in-environments-that-make-them-feel-a-sense-of-fit-says-associate-professor-deleon-gra/
25. Han, J., & Geng, X. (2023). University students’ approaches to online learning technologies: The roles of perceived support, affect/emotion and self-efficacy in technology-enhanced learning. Computers & Education, 194, 104695.
26. Han, S., Jung, J., Ji, H., Lee, U., & Liu, M. (2023). The role of social presence in MOOC students’ behavioral intentions and sentiments toward the usage of a learning assistant chatbot: A diversity, equity, and inclusion perspective examination. In N. Wang,
27. Hibah, A. (2021). Privacy features of Telegram in educational settings. Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2021.1234567
28. Higgins, E., Posada, J., Kimble-Brown, Q., Abler, S., Coy, A., & Hamidi, F. (2023). Investigating an equitybased participatory approach to technology-rich learning in community recreation centers. In A. Schmidt, K. Väänänen, T. Goyal, P. O. Kristensson, A. Peters, S. Mueller, J. R. Williamson, & M. L. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2023, Hamburg, Germany, April 23–28, 2023 (pp. 443:1–443:18). ACM.
29. Ilobeneke, J. S., Adeyemi, T. O., & Oluwatoyin, A. (2018a). Comparative analysis of WhatsApp and Facebook in student achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 45- 60. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2018.1234567
30. Jamil, H. (2023). Online tutoring and plagiarism-aware authentic assessment of database design assignments. In IEEE international conference on teaching, assessment and learning for engineering (TALE 2023), Auckland, New Zealand. November 27–December 1, 2023. IEEE Computer Society.
31. Jamil, H., & Shawon, F. (2023). Automatic and authentic eAssessment of online database design theory assignments. In International conference on web-based learning, ICWL 2023, Sydney, Australia, November 26–28, 2023 (pp. 77–91). Springer.
32. Johnson, L. (2021). Social media platforms in education: A review. Educational Technology Research, 29(4), 567-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2021.1234567
33. Johnson, P., & Davis, M. (2023). Inclusivity challenges in mobile instant messaging use. Journal of Digital Education and Policy Studies, 6(3), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeps.2023.110123
34. Joyner, D. A. (2023). ChatGPT in Education: Partner or Pariah? XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 29(3), 48–51.
35. Jukic, N., Vrbsky, S., Nestorov, S., & Sharma, A. (2020 ). Erdplus. Available online: https://erdplus.com/ (accessed on 20 December 2024).
36. Kessler, J., Tschuggnall, M., & Specht, G. (2019). RelaX: A webbased execution and learning tool for relational algebra. In T. Grust, F. Naumann, A. Böhm, W. Lehner, T. Härder, E. Rahm, & A. Heuer (Eds.), Datenbanksysteme für business, technologie und web (BTW 2019), 18. fachtagung des gi-fachbereichs “datenbanken und informationssysteme” (dbis), 4–8 März 2019, Rostock, Germany, proceedings (Vol. P- 289, pp. 503–506). Gesellschaft für Informatik. https://doi.org/10.18420/btw2019-32.
37. Khalil, M., & Er, E. (2023). Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of plagiarism detection. In P. Zaphiris, & A. Ioannou (Eds.), Learning and collaboration technologies—10th international conference, LCT 2023, held as part of the 25th HCI international conference, HCII 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 23–28, 2023, proceedings, part I (Vol. 14040, pp. 475–487). Springer.
38. Khalil, M., Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2023). Fairness, trust, transparency, equity, and responsibility in learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 10(1), 1–7.
39. Kiesler, N., & Schiffner, D. (2023). Large language models in introductory programming education: ChatGPT’s performance and implications for assessments. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.08572.
40. Kung, H., & Tung, H. (2006). An alternative approach to teaching database normalization: A simple algorithm and an interactive e-learning tool. Journal of Information Systems Education, 17(3), 315–326.
41. Kung, H.-J., & Tung, H.-L. (2006). A web-based tool to enhance teaching/learning database normalization. Sais. Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/sais2006/43 (accessed on 20 December 2024 ).
42. Lazarova, M., Aleksieva-Petrova, A., & Tasheva A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th balkan conference on informatics, BCI 2019, Sofia, Bulgaria, September 26–28, 2019 (pp. 35:1–35:4). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351556.3351589.
43. Li, J., Gui, L., Zhou, Y., West, D., Aloisi, C., & He, Y. (2023). Distilling ChatGPT for explainable automated student answer assessment.
44. Lin, S., Chung, H., Chung, F., & Lan, Y. (2023). Concerns about using ChatGPT in education. In Y. Huang, & T. Rocha (Eds.), Innovative technologies and learning—6th international conference, ICITL 2023, Porto, Portugal, August 28–30, 2023, proceedings (Vol. 14099, pp. 37–49). Springer.
45. Littenberg-Tobias, J., & Reich, J. (2020). Evaluating access, quality, and equity in online learning: A case study of a MOOC-based blended professional degree program. The Internet and Higher Education, 47, 100759.
46. Lyu, W., Wang, Y., Chung, T. R., Sun, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Evaluating the effectiveness of LLMs in introductory computer science education: A semester-long field study. In D. Joyner, M. K. Kim, X. Wang, & M. Xia (Eds.), Proceedings of the eleventh ACM conference on learning @ scale, l@s 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA, July 18–20, 2024 (pp. 63–74). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3657604.3662036.
47. Mawasi, A., Aguilera, E., Wylie, R., & Gee, E. (2020). Neutrality, “New” digital divide, and openness paradox: Equity in learning environments mediated by educational technology. In Interdisciplinarity in the learning sciences: Proceedings of the 14th international conference of the learning sciences, ICLS 2020, [Nashville, Tennessee, Usa], online conference, June 19–23, 2020. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
48. Mazzullo, E., Bulut, O., Wongvorachan, T., & Tan, B. (2023). Learning analytics in the era of large language models. Analytics, 2(4), 877–898. https://doi.org/10.3390/analytics2040046.
49. McBroom, J., Yacef, K., & Koprinska, I. (2020). Scalability in online computer programming education: Automated techniques for feedback, evaluation and equity. In A. N. Rafferty, J. Whitehill, C. Romero, & V. Cavalli-Sforza (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th international conference on educational data mining, EDM 2020, fully virtual conference, July 10–13, 2020. International Educational Data Mining Society. mcrem2/database_design_tool.cgi (accessed on 20 December 2024).
50. Meinel, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Specht, M., & Ogan A. (Eds.), L@s’21: Eighth ACM conference on learning @ scale, virtual event, Germany, June 22–25, 2021 (pp. 287–290). ACM
51. Mitrovic, A. (2002). NORMIT: A web-enabled tutor for database normalization. In International conference on computers in education, ICCE 2002, Auckland, New Zealand, December 3–6, 2002 (Vol. 2, pp. 1276– 1280). IEEE Computer Society.
52. Mohammed, I. A., & Kuta, I. I. (2021). Telegram: A social media tool for fostering collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of School of Science and Technology Education (pp. 522-525). https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2021.1234567
53. Mohammed, I. A., & Ogar, S. I. (2023). Exploring the potential of YouTube videos towards enhancing achievement and retention of undergraduate students in environmental education. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 4(1), e02302. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/13190
54. Niloy, A. C., Bari, M. A., Sultana, J., Chowdhury, R., Raisa, F. M., Islam, A., Mahmud, S., Jahan, I., Sarkar, M., Akter, S., Nishat, N., Afroz, M., Sen, A., Islam, T., Tareq, M. H., & Hossen, M. A. (2024). Why do students use ChatGPT? Answering through a triangulation approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100208. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2024.100208.
55. Omar, M. N. A. (2021). The impact of using WhatsApp groups on the Palestinian university students’ productive skills improvement [Master’s thesis, An-Najah National University]. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2021.1234567
56. Oteyola, T., et al. (2021). WhatsApp in micro-teaching contexts: Enhancing student engagement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 49(5), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2020.1858496
57. Pardos, Z. A., & Bhandari, S. (2023). Learning gain differences between ChatGPT and human tutor generated algebra hints. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.06871.
58. Piza-Dávila, H. I., Preciado, L. F. G., & Ortega-Guzmán, V. H. (2017). An educational software for teaching database normalization.
59. Pozdniakov, S., Brazil, J., Abdi, S., Bakharia, A., Sadiq, S., Gaševic´, D., Denny, P., & Khosravi, H. (2024). Large language models meet user interfaces: The case of provisioning feedback. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100289. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100289. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 13(12), 2989–2992.
60. Qureshi, B. (2023). Exploring the use of ChatGPT as a tool for learning and assessment in undergraduate computer science curriculum: Opportunities and challenges. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.11214 Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Dimitrova, V., Matsuda, N., & Santos O.C. (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education. posters and late breaking results, workshops and tutorials, industry and innovation tracks, practitioners, doctoral consortium and blue sky—24th international conference, AIED 2023, Tokyo, Japan, July 3–7, 2023, proceedings (Vol. 1831, pp. 236–241). Springer.
61. Rospigliosi, P. A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in teaching and learning: What questions should we ask of ChatGPT? Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 1–3.
62. Röhm, U., Brent, L., Dawborn, T., & Jeffries, B. (2020). SQL for data scientists: Designing SQL tutorials for scalable online teaching.
63. Rueda, M. M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the implementation of ChatGPT in education: A systematic review. Computers, 12(8), 153.
64. Safitri, D. (2021). WhatsApp and student achievement: A comparative study. Journal of Educational Technology,
65. Seetharaman, R. (2023). Revolutionizing medical education: Can ChatGPT boost subjective learning and expression? Journal of Medical Systems, 47(1), 61.
66. Shahzad, T., Mazhar, T., Tariq, M. U., Ahmad, W., Ouahada, K., & Hamam, H. (2025). A comprehensive review of large language models: Issues and solutions in learning environments. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00815-8.
67. Silberschatz, A., Korth, H. F., & Sudarshan, S. (2020). Database system concepts (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Book Company.
68. Simposio Internacional de Informatica Educativa, SIIE (2006), Leon, Spain.
69. Soares, J. A. (2011, July). The matthew effect: How advantage begets further advantage. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 40(4), 477–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306111412516hh.
70. Soler, J., Boada, I., Prados, F., & Poch, J. (2006, October 24–26). A web-based problem-solving environment for database normalization.
71. Springfield, I. (2024 ). Relational database tools. Available online: https://uisacad5.uis.edu/cgi-bin/
72. Stefanidis, C., & Koloniari, G. (2016). An interactive tool for teaching and learning database normalization. In Proceedings of the 20th pan-hellenic conference on informatics, Patras, Greece, November 10–12, 2016 (p. 18). ACM. Available online: http://dl.acm.org/ citation.cfm?id=3003790 (accessed on 20 December 2024 ).
73. Vasconcelos, M. A. R., & dos Santos, R. P. (2023). Enhancing STEM learning with ChatGPT and bing chat as objects to think with: A case study. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.02202.
74. Walberg, H. J., & Tsai, S.-L. (1983). Matthew effects in education. American Educational Research Journal, 20(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/ 10.3102/00028312020003359.
75. Wang, J., & Stantic, B. (2019). Facilitating learning by practice and examples: A tool for learning table normalization. In G. Eleftherakis,
76. Williams, P. A., & Roberts, J. M. (2021). Collaborative learning strategies for enhancing student engagement. Journal of Collaborative Education, 10(1), 45– 60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2021.1875643
77. Williamson, K., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2021). Learning analytics dashboard research has neglected diversity, equity and inclusion. In
78. Williamson, K., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2022). A review of learning analytics dashboard research in higher education: Implications for justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion. In LAK 2022: 12th international learning analytics and knowledge conference, online event, USA, March 21–25, 2022 (pp. 260–270). ACM.
79. World Bank. (2021). The societal benefits of tertiary education. World Bank Education Report. https://worldbank.org/education-report-2021
80. Xiang, V., Snell, C., Gandhi, K., Albalak, A., Singh, A., Blagden, C., Phung, D., Rafailov, R., Lile, N., Mahan, D., Castricato, L., Franken, J.-P., Haber, N., & Finn, C. (2025). Towards system 2 reasoning in llms: Learning how to think with meta chain-of-thought. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.04682(accessed on 20 December 2024 ).
81. Yang, F. (2011). A virtual tutor for relational schema normalization. ACM Inroads, 2(3), 38–42.
82. Zhai, X. (2023). ChatGPT for next generation science learning. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 29(3), 42–46.
83. Zheng, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for teaching and learning: An experience from data science education. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2307.16650.