Ana yönlendirme menüsünü atla Ana içeriği atla Site alt kısmını atla

Teaching Conceptual Approaches to Interior Architecture Students by Integrating Theory and Practice

Cilt 10 Sayı 83 kapak

Abstract

For interior architects, conceptual approach acts as a purpose, and lead to the realization of the final design which requires to be functional yet original and valuable. Existing research has mainly exposed findings related to conceptual approaches in architecture, but it is crucial to consider the conceptual approaches for interior architecture in its own content. Creativity is an important factor for competing in design and education. Current study was developed with concern to the importance of offering a course related to concept development in interior architecture programmes. Integrating theory and practice by offering lectures and exercises about key topics of understanding, communicating and developing concepts were the methods adopted for this course. Results showed that student weaknesses such as communication of ideas with weak presentation skills and an inability to distinguish the main design concept from design ideas was improved towards the end of the semester. The findings of this study contributes to raise awareness about the importance of considering interior architecture concept independently from architecture and transfer this awareness to the level of educational programmes. Moreover, offering theory and practice related to concept development will help interior architecture students gain a higher degree of awareness on creative design development.

Keywords Conceptual development, impressive communication, creative thinking

PDF

Kaynakça

  1. Abel, Chris. Architecture as Identity, I: The Essence of Architecture. In: Semiotics 1980. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9137-1_1, 1982.
  2. Ambrose, Gavin. Harris, Paul. Basics Design: Design Thinking. Lausanne, Switzerland: AVA Publishing SA, 2010.
  3. Andreasen, Martin . M, Hansen, Claus. Thorp. & Cash, Philip. Conceptual design: Interpretations, mindset and models. Cham: Springer, 2015.
  4. Ayiran, Nezih. “The role of metaphors in the formation of architectural identity”. ITU A|Z, 9(2), 2012:1-21.
  5. Bletcher, Joanna. “The Constellation: A framework for conceptualising design as a process of innovation”, The Design Journal, 2017: S4552-S4564, DOI: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352952
  6. Broadbent, Geoffrey. Design in architecture: architecture and the human sciences. London, New York, Wiley, 1973.
  7. Caballero, Rosario. “Thinking, drawing and writing architecture through metaphor”. Redalyc, 28, 2014:155-179.
  8. Cable, Cochran. Symbolism in architecture. Monticello, IL: Vance Bibliographies, (1981).
  9. Casakin, Hernan. “Visual analogy, visual displays, and the nature of design problems: the effect of expertise”. Environmental Planning and Design: Design B., 37, 2010:170-188.
  10. Casakin, Hernan. Timmeren, Arjan. Van. “Analogies as Creative Inspiration Sources in the Design Studio: The Teamwork”. Athens Journal of Architecture, 1(1), 2015: 51-64. doi: 10.30958/aja.1-1-4
  11. Cirlot, Juan. Eduardo. Dictionary of symbols. London: Routledge, 2001.
  12. Coles, John. House, Naomi. The fundamentals of interior architecture. Lausanne: AVA Academia, 2007.
  13. Dodsworth, Simon. The fundamentals of interior design. London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 2009.
  14. Dogan, Fehmi. “Architectural Design Students' Explorations through Conceptual Diagrams”, The Design Journal, 16:1, 2013:103-124, doi:10.2752/175630613X13328375149002.
  15. Gibbs, Jenny. Interior design. London, UK: Laurence King, 2005.
  16. Gobert, Janice D. “Expertise in the Comprehension of Architectural Plans: Knowledge Acquisition and Inference Making”. (John S. Gero and Barbara. Tversky, Eds.), In Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design '99, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition: University of Sydney, AU, 1999.
  17. Hadian, Amir. Sasan. “Using Metaphor and Analogy for Understanding Structural Concepts in Architectural Education; an Iranian Perspective”. Open House International, 40(2), 2015:29-36. doi:10.1108/OHI-02- 2015-B0005
  18. Holl, Steven. Idea and Phenomena, Lars Muller Publishers. 2002.
  19. Jencks, Charles. The language of post-modern architecture. New York: Rizzoli, 1991.
  20. Jencks, Charles. The iconic building: The power of enigma. London: Frances Lincoln, 2005.
  21. Kilmer, Rosemary. Kilmer, W. Otie. Designing interiors. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. (2014).
  22. Kim, Jongbae. Wilemon, David. “Focusing the fuzzy front–end in new product development”. R&D Management, 32(4), 2002: 269–279.
  23. Laiprakobsup, Narongpon. In between place: The emergence of the essence (Doctoral dissertation, 2010). College Station, TX: Texas A & M University, 2010.
  24. Lakoff, George. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor (Andrew. Ortony, Ed.). In Metaphor and thought (pp. 202-251). Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  25. Lazutinaa, Tatyana.V. Pupyshevab, Irina. N. Shcherbininb, Mikhail. Baksheeva, Vladimir. N. Patrakovac, Galina. V. “Semiotics of Art: Language of Architecture as a Complex System of Signs”. International Journal of Environmental Science Education, 11(17), 2016: 9991-9998.
  26. Lewis, Theodore. Creativity, A Framework for the Design/Problem: Solving Discourse in Technology Education. Journal of Technology Education, 17(1), 2005: 35-52.
  27. Leydecker, Sylvia. In Between: Interior Design Between Architecture and Design. In Designing interior architecture: Concept, typology, material, construction (pp. 10-61). Basel, Switzerland: Birkhä user Verlag AG, 2013.
  28. Lockard, William. Kirby. Design Drawing Experience. Tucson: Pepper Publishing, 1973.
  29. Lopez, Michael. J. Retail store planning & design manual (2nd ed.). New York. John Wiley & Sons, (1995).
  30. Maki, Peggy. Assessing for Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus. (2004).
  31. Mankus, Martynas. “Manifestations of Symbolism in Architecture of Postmodernism”. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 38(4), 2014: 274-282. doi:10.3846/20297955.2014.998853.
  32. Mas, Angeles. Blasco, Vicente. Lerma, Carlos. Angulo, Quiteria. “Comprehension of Architectural Construction through Multimedia Active Learning”. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 3(2), 2013:1-12, doi:10.5539/hes.v3n2p1.
  33. McLain-Kark, John. Dhuru, Shilpa. Parrott, Kathleen. Lovingood, Rebbeca. Client comparison of three design presentation methods. Journal of Interior Design, 24(1), 1998: 1-11. doi:10.1111/j.1939- 1668.1998.tb00557.x
  34. Nagasundaram, Murli. Creativity, Group Support Systems, and Systems Development. In Systems Development Methods for the Next Century (Wojtkowski, W. Gregory, Wita. Wojtkowski, Stanislaw. Wrycza, Armi. Krajowej, & Joze. Zupancic, Eds.). Boston: Springer, 1997: 39–48.
  35. National Research Council. Evaluating and Improving Undergraduate Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, (Marye Anne Fox & Norman Hackerman, Eds.), Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10024.html .
  36. Norberg-Schulz, Christian. Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. London: Academy Editions, 1980.
  37. Nussbaumer, Linda L. Guerin, Denise. A. “The Relationship Between Learning Styles and Visualization Skills Among Interior Design Students”. Journal of Interior Design, 26(2), 2000: 1-15. doi:10.1111/j.1939- 1668.2000.tb00355.x
  38. Ortony, Andrew. Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  39. Osmond, Jane. Turner, Andrew. The threshold concept journey: From identification to application. In Threshold concepts and transformational learning, (Jan. H. F, Meyer, Ray. Land & Caroline. Baillie, Eds.), (pp. 347- 364). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers, 2009.
  40. Paul, Richard. Elder, Linda. The Nature and Functions of Critical & Creative Thinking. Tomales: Foundation for Critical Thinking Press, 2008.
  41. Pekkala, Janne. Ylirisku, Salu. “The Role of Design Concepts in the Development of Digitalized Industrial Services”, The Design Journal, 20:sup1, 2017: S2813-S2822, DOI: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352792
  42. Piotrowski, Christine. M. Interior design management: A handbook for owners and managers. New York: Wiley, 1992.
  43. Piotrowski, Christine. M. Becoming an interior designer: A guide to careers in design. Chichester: J. Wiley and Sons, 2009.
  44. Piotrowski, Christine. M. Professional practice for interior designers. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2020.
  45. Plowright, Philip. D. Revealing Architectural Design. London: Routledge, 2014.
  46. Portillo, M. (1996). Uncovering Implicit Theories of Creativity in Beginning Design Students. Journal of Interior Design, 22(2), 15–24. doi:10.1111/j.1939-1668.1996.tb00232.x
  47. Reiter-Palmon, Roni. Illies, Marcy. Young. Cross, Kobe. Lisa. Buboltz, Cara. Beth. Nimps, Tom. “Creativity and Domain Specificity: The Effect of Task Type on Multiple Indexes of Creative Problem Solving”. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity & the Arts, 3, 2009: 73–80.
  48. Rodgers, Paul. Jones, Paul. “Comparing University Design Students’ and Tutors’ Perceptions of Creativity”. The Design Journal, 20(4), 2017: 435–457. doi:10.1080/14606925.2017.1323503
  49. Schwarzer, Mitchell. W. Schmarsow, August. “The Emergence of Architectural Space: August Schmarsow’s Theory of Raumgestaltung”. Assemblage, 15, 1991: 48-61, doi:10.2307/3171125.
  50. Sully, Anthony. Interior Design: Conceptual basis. New York: Springer International Pu, 2016.
  51. Tait, James. The architecture concept book: An inspirational guide to creative ideas, strategies and practices. London: Thames & Hudson, 2018.
  52. Tenbrink, Thora. Dalton, Ruth. C. Jago, A. Williams. The Language of Architectural Diagrams, Creative Commons License CC-BY 14th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2019). (Sabine. Timpf, Christoph. Schlieder, Markus. Kattenbeck, Bernd. Ludwig, & Kathleen. Stewart., Ed.); 17, 2019:1–14.
  53. Janson, Alban. Tigges, Florian. Fundamental Concepts of Architecture: The Vocabulary of Spatial Situations. Birkhä user: Switzerland, 2014.
  54. Travis, Stephanie. "Conceptual Thinking: The Design Concept in Interior Design Education". Design Principles & Practice: An International Journal, 5(6), 2011: 679-694.
  55. Uddin, Saleh. Composite drawing: Techniques for architectural design presentation. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
  56. Rieber, Robert. W. Development of Thinking and Formation of Concepts in the Adolescent. In The Essential (Rieber, Robert W. & Robinson, David, Eds.), (pp. 415–470). New York: Kluwer, 2004.
  57. Yee, Rendow. Architectural drawing: A visual compendium of types and methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2013.
  58. Ylirisku, Salu. Frame it simple! Towards a theory of conceptual designing (Doctoral dissertation). Helsinki, Finland: Aalto University, 2013.